powered by Bonneville Seattle - News Talk 97.3 KIRO FM, 710 ESPN Seattle and 770 KTTH: The Truth


Sports
Seahawks Blog
710 ESPN Seattle
Blog   |   RSS   |   More Seahawks News   |   710 ESPN Seattle   |  

Updated Oct 5, 2009 - 2:37 pm

In Defense of Seneca...

Comments   |   Print this   |   E-mail this

by Dave Wyman

Yesterday as I watched the Seahawks lose to the Colts, I got the feeling that Seneca Wallace wasn't playing well. But as Jim Mora likes to say, I needed to look at the film (OK, for me it's the broadcast, but I do have Tivo and a nice high-def TV). It's not NFL game film, but I know what I see.

Based on the callers' reaction in the postgame, the texts and the emails I've seen since, the city of Seattle is ready to ship Seneca off to the CFL.

I'll admit, I had the feeling that he didn't get it done. I saw him take a sack when he could've thrown the ball away. There were a couple of times I thought he could've taken off running … a lesson he failed to learn from last week. And of course there was the crucial illegal forward pass.

But here's what else I saw…

I saw him deliver some extremely well thrown passes. Especially the throw that's known as the "Cover 2 hole shot." It's a pass to the sideline 15-20 yards deep in between the corner and the safety. The "window" or open space you throw that through is about the size of a cereal box, and Seneca delivered it perfectly. As a matter of fact, Peyton Manning threw that same pass earlier in the game, and I thought Seneca's version was better.

He also made some plays avoiding pressure that I would argue no other quarterback in the league could make. And to this point, I am unwavering: Seneca is the best athlete at the quarterback position in the NFL. When you consider who the Hawks are playing with at O-line, is there another backup quarterback you'd want in there?

One thing I didn't like was Seneca's posture on the sidelines. He seemed to be brooding, along with the rest of the team. But I like Seneca; I have always known him to be a tough guy and a good team football player, so I thought I'd give him the benefit of the doubt. So, I went back and looked at how Seneca performed in the 4th quarter with the game out of reach (28-3). Let's forget body language for a moment and check out the results.

On the first series, he was sacked by Dwight Freeney and because of that, the drive stalled. On the next series, he was sacked again by Robert Mathis and this time Mathis hammered his throwing arm, causing him to fumble.

So let me set the stage. Seneca is playing quarterback in the 4th quarter of a game that is way out of reach. It's 34-3 on the road against arguably the hottest team in the NFL right now. His offensive line consists of 1 regular starter, 1 rookie and 3 backups. He has been sacked 5 times and avoided countless other sacks with his feet. Roaming the field are two guys (Mathis and Freeney) that are tied for 3rd in the league in sacks and are looking to pad their stats.

How does he respond? First, he takes the Hawks on a 70-yard scoring drive during which he goes 7 for 9, and scrambles the last 7-yards for a rushing touchdown.

Second, he goes 6 for 9 and leads the team to another touchdown. I know what you're going to say. "Yeah but that was against the Colts' backups." SENECA IS A BACKUP! His offensive line is beyond backup! Regardless of what it "looked like" on the sidelines, the results indicate that he was a warrior in that 4th quarter.

Then I went to the stat sheet. Seneca threw for 257 yards, didn't throw an interception and had a passer rating of 94. How do you suppose that compares to other QBs around the league? Hmmm…..I'll tell you what, I'm going to randomly select a quarterback from another team. Just….off the top of my head….how about…..Mark Sanchez! That name sounds familiar, doesn't it? He's the guy that we should've drafted and that everyone thinks would've saved this franchise.

Here are Mark Sanchez's numbers from yesterday: He threw for 138 yards, threw 3 interceptions, fumbled once and had a passer rating of 27.

Yeah, but everybody has a bad game now and then. So, let's compare Seneca's numbers with Sanchez's numbers for the year:

Yds Completion % TDs Ints QB Rating

Wallace: 645 66.1 3 2 82.6
Sanchez: 744 57.3 4 5!! 71.2

Yes, Sanchez has more yardage and more touchdowns, but consider this:
-Seneca has played in 1.5 fewer games than Sanchez
-Sanchez has one of the better offensive lines in the league
-The Jets have a top 5 defense
-Seneca wasn't the #6 pick of the NFL draft

Furthermore, as NFC West blogger Mike Sando pointed out, the Jets entered Week 4 running the ball 78% of the time on 1st down, the highest percentage in the league. They're protecting their rookie and are wise in doing so.

With all that said, I'm no Sanchez hater. I think Mark Sanchez is going to be a good quarterback. But he is not the only guy out there. Someday it'll be time to find Matt Hasselbeck's replacement. Someday maybe Mike Teel may develop into a better backup quarterback than Seneca Wallace. But for now, I'm straining to see where this team can do better.

The Seahawks are cold right now … ice cold. But momentum is a powerful thing and two wins at home against the Jags and Cards can get that momentum turned around.

Upon Further Review…

Again, as I re-watched the game, I was eager to see the penalties that were not so bad in number as much as they were ill-timed. What I saw was appalling. The 3 holding calls, 2 on Ray Willis and 1 on Mansfield Wrotto, were not ticky-tack calls, they were simply … non-existent penalties. If you're wondering what I'm talking about, think about the holding calls on Sean Locklear and Chris Gray in Super Bowl XL that had every one in Seattle up in arms. Yeah, these were worse.

Let's put it this way: I finally have the justification that I've been looking for to make the case that I was a perennial pro-bowl linebacker. According to the criteria these calls were based on, I really was held on EVERY PLAY! Okay, I think I've made my point. The calls were atrocious.

I'm going to venture a guess that the Seahawks will have Thom Fermstead, who has been their faithful video director since they processed football film in a darkroom and dropped it into a can, put together a tape of those plays. They'll send it into the NFL office back in New York. The NFL will get it and say:

"Oh, do we still have a team in Seattle?"

Then they'll look at the film and think to themselves, "Yeah these were bad calls, but again … it's Seattle."

Then, they'll issue one of the most heartfelt apologies they can muster up. Think of the scene in the movie Animal House where Blutto hears a guy strumming on the guitar the song "I gave my love a Cherry" at the Delta house Toga party. He grabs the guitar, smashes it into a 1,000 pieces and then hands it back …shrugs…and says… "sorry." There you have it.

I have some experience with this. My 9th and final season in the NFL, I played in Denver and we had a Sunday night game late in the season at Philadelphia. Because of injuries, I was pressed into service on the kick-off return team, something I hadn't played since my rookie year. I wasn't happy about it, but I did my best.

Bronco Card

On one particular kick off, my assignment was to block a player named Barry Wilburn, a veteran on Philly's kick-off team who was also old and out of place on special teams! I put my head right across his numbers and knocked him 5-yards out of bounds.

I turned around to see a penalty flag on the ground. I looked at the ref and asked "Who?!!" As he turned and made the call, "Block in the back...number 92" I looked over at Barry and said, "Barry…you know that was clean!" He looked at the ref to make sure he wasn't looking, and then sheepishly looked over at me and said, "Yeah man…you got me."

So the next day, our special teams coach sent the film into the league. Turns out, my "penalty" negated yardage for our return man, and my fellow Stanford Cardinal Glyn Milburn, that would have set an NFL record for single game return yardage. The NFL looked at the film and issued the following statement: Sorry.

That's what the Seahawks can expect.

Whining about penalties is dangerous. As is lamenting missed field goals. But this is what happens when you are, as I mentioned, ice cold. The ball doesn’t bounce your way, you suffer injuries at key positions and calls don’t go your way. You have to be perfect. Until the Hawks can build some momentum, this is the uphill battle they face.


  • Add A Comment

  • RJP wrote...
    Seneca
    Certain people will just bash Seneca because he's not the incredibly overrated Matt Hasselbeck. Wait till hass gets back and performs even worse than Seneca. I wonder if you'll get those same people calling for his head or if they'll just turn the blame to the o-line because hass is above criticism. Lame!
  • tank51 wrote...
    Blah Blah Blah...........
    Please don't take any Offense to what I'm about to say Dave......... But anyone who Defends Seneca Wallace for his bad play is short minded..... What about the BAD BAD passes he has made and the HORRIBLE HORRIBLE plays he has made....... He alone lost the Bears game with or without the blown calls by the Refs.................. Guess what he's a PRO FOOTBALL PLAYER he shouldn't be treated like a baby he's a man and should take the responsibility of Playing poorly................... We can't win with Wallace as our starting QB and that's a fact........... We really need to see what we have in Mike Teel and next game would be a nice test for Teel............
  • rajuseattle wrote...
    Looser's mentality.
    Dave, No offence to you but bottomline Hawks orgnization is promoting the looser's mentality, when ex-Hawks players like you come and defend the poor performances and try to put some blame on the refs and suggesting those penalties were game changing. Coach Mora trying to suggest same thing in his morning show. Noone in Seattle buying this sill excuse and looser's mentality. Blaming it on REFs is not going to help Hawks. You better start taking some preaching classes for the current defence and try to instill the "fighting until the end" spirit into this team. Praising the heroics during Garbage time is not going to cool down the passionate and somehow angry SeaHawk fans. Please dont fool us, Hawks front office andspecially the personnel selection department failed miserably for past 3 yrs to address the burning issues of QB, O-line and Secondary defence. Please work on these 3 issues first before making this looser's excuse.
  • Skeezix wrote...
    INDIANAPPOLIS LOOKED TO HAVE NICE WEATHER . . ? ? ?
    IT WAS A BEAUTIFUL DAY FOR A FOOTBALL GAME ! IT WAS GOOD TO SEE "SUPER BOWL" CONTENDERS PLAY ! ! !
  • GardnerHawksFan wrote...
    Wallace
    Dave, Thanks for commenting and noticing some things I did not. First - I did not watch all the 3rd qtr and the 4th because I was so disgusted. I have seen Seneca miss some wide open guys, and he has run out of bounds 2 times for a LOSS - 1 time each against CHI and IND - when he could have thrown it away. I thought he looked like a pouting kid. But you add some balance to my out of my mind crankiness. Our defense and our defensive coach really dissapointed me. We are not hit hard with injuries on defense, and the Hawks go in and just lay an egg. And to hear Mora talk after the game he sounded to much like a HS coach. We love challenges in this business. We have all this money in our defense, and we cannot punch anyone in the proverbial mouth. Meanwhile in SF Singletary is doing it with lesser known names and there defense is playing like I want ours to play. Thanks Dave Wyman - you should write about the underperforming defense and call out guys that are not making plays. It is OK - I will not tell anyone - just tell me.
  • ShwaggyD wrote...
    playing from behind
    Wallace is being wrongly abused by fans who fail to undertand or look at the whole picture. Seneca is doing as good as can be expected when all is considered, especially when the Seahawks are supposed to be a top defensive team (according to Ruskell/Mora). In Indy did we see a top tier D? NO, we saw a pathetic defensive job that gave up 3 long TD's in the 1st 4 drives by Indy. By the second qtr Wallace and the offense we being forced into being one dimensional because of this; but the fans want to blame Seneca and the offense for the defensive ineptitude.
  • paperbackwriter wrote...
    wallace
    if wallace was who everyone would like him to be, he'd be starting somewhere else. he's a backup, and a darn good one given what he's given to play with and the relatively little on field time he's had with the new scheme. come on people. this was the Colts they were playing against. They would have lost with the starters in the OL healthy and Hass healthy. The refs would have seen to that.
  • Tree wrote...
    attitude
    Overall game performance has more to do with attitude than ability...especially in post game review! I agree with the comment on SF and Singletary. If u think you are a back-up you'll always be a back-up. If u think u have too many problems, there r too many. Move on and improve!
  • jerestotle wrote...
    Great blog Wyman
    Seriously: I'm glad there is a few others 12ers out there capable of critically analyzing a game. You hit it on the head Wyman: That's why you were a professional. Last I checked, this is a team game, and Wallace did not get much support: again. Overall, I still say Seahawk fans are the best in the league, but we do have our fair share myopic arm-chair QB's who can see no further than what the most obvious position on the field is doing. Clearly, fans obnoxiously overcritical of Wallace (and Hass) never made it out of pee-wee's themselves. Sure, we all know Wallace has not been at his best these last two games, and he needs to step it up (and run more); but overall he has been solid. And how quickly we forget his good games over the past few years! How often has he ever played with the full first team? If Wallace decides to leave, and he will when his contract is done, he will be snatched up in a heartbeat. Its too bad he was never utilized to his full ability. If you want to blame anyone for the Hawk's poor start: blame me. I'm a lifelong fan from the Midwest who was excited to finally relocate to "the nest" last year. Yet the Hawks have been cursed ever since I got here!
  • Master Sgt wrote...
    Wallace
    By the numbers, he looks like a quarterback. BUT the one thing he is NOT is a leader. Watch any game and watch what a real quarterback does on the sidelines when his team is down, What they do NOT do is sit and feel sorry for themselves! Any team needs a leader on the sidelines to pump them up, or kick them in the anal area when needed. Matt has it Farve has it, Seneca ...NOT. Sure he made mistakes, also sure he has the arm and ability to be a 'good' QB. But untill he becomes a leader those around him will feed off of his 'vibes'.






News
Local
National
World
Money
Lifestyle
Sci/Tech
Odd News
Politics

Multimedia
Photo Galleries
Videos
Sports
Mariners
Seahawks
Sounders
College
Storm
Blogs
NBA
Golf
NHL
Tennis
Olympics
Auto Racing
Entertainment
Dining
Movies
Movie Times
Calendar of Events
Entertainment News
Television
Travel
Tom Douglas
Chef Jeremy
Tom Tangney
Fit in the City
Seattle Fashionistas
the mixtape
Weather
Local Conditions
School Closings
Earthquake Tracker

Traffic
Current Conditions

Podcasts
Download past shows
Daily audio roll
Blogs
Dave Ross
Dori Monson
Ron and Don
TBTL
David Boze
Michael Medved
Frank Shiers
Phil the News Junkie
MyNorthwest Blog
Shannon Drayer
Kevin Calabro
Brock and Salk
97.3 KIRO FM
Shows/Hosts
Schedule
Events/Contests
Press Releases
Community Outreach

770 KTTH: The Truth
Shows/Hosts
Schedule

710 ESPN Seattle
Shows/Hosts
Schedule
Home   |   Contact Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement   |   Copyright Infringement   |   Employment   |   EEO Public File Report   |   Contest Rules   |   Set Us as Your Home Page   |   RSS
Copyright © 2010 Bonneville International. All rights reserved.