powered by Bonneville Seattle - News Talk 97.3 KIRO FM and 770 KTTH: The Truth

Updated Oct 28, 2009 - 7:00 pm

Boeing chooses South Carolina over Everett

Comments   |   Print this   |   E-mail this   |  
MyNorthwest.com staff

Boeing has confirmed the company will send its second 787 production line to North Charleston, South Carolina rather than Everett.

"Establishing a second 787 assembly line in North Charleston will expand our production capability to meet the market demand for the airplane," said Jim Albaugh, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes in a news release.

Boeing said in addition to building the Dreamliner in South Carolina, the company also has the capability to test and deliver the airplanes from that facility.

In a live news conference after the announcement from Boeing, Washington Governor Chris Gregoire said there's still a responsibility to support the some 80,000 aerospace workers in the state. Gregoire also stressed the need to move forward, the first step of which will be securing the Airforce Tanker contract.

The South Carolina full Senate voted 44-0 on low-interest construction bonds and incentives that include a sales tax exemption on fuel used in test flights. To qualify, a company would have to create at least 3,800 full-time jobs and invest at least $750 million in the state over seven years.

"I can't tell you how thrilled I am and the people of South Carolina are to be a part of the Boeing family, to be a part of a company that produces world-class aircraft," South Carolina Senator Larry Grooms told KIRO Radio.

"It's really a dream come true for the people of our state. We have one of the highest unemployment in the nation. We have the highest unemployment in the south," said Groom.

Groom added that he doesn't believe his state took jobs away from Puget Sound Boeing workers. "We're not a bunch of poachers. We're all Americans and the competition is not with Americans, it's with the Europeans and Airbus. I don't want Airbus kicking our tail."

Until the move is complete, Boeing said it will "establish transitional surge capability at its Everett location to ensure the successful introduction of the 787-9, the first derivative model of the 787." When that second line is running on its own, the "surge capability in Everett will be phased out."

Everett is the site of Boeing's commercial aircraft division, where the company has assembled early versions of the 787. The first flight and deliveries of the high- tech aircraft have been postponed repeatedly due to manufacturing glitches and a labor strike.

Despite the decision to move, Albaugh said, "We remain committed to Puget Sound." He added, "Everett will continue to design and produce airplanes, including the 787, and there is tremendous opportunity for our current and future products here."

On Wednesday morning Senator Patty Murray asked both the Machinists and Boeing officials to Washington D.C. to restart their talks under her moderation.

Talks between Boeing and the Puget Sound Machinists union over a proposed 10 year no-strike deal ended without an agreement.


Comments (81)
  • Add A Comment

  • PixiePal wrote...
    Hello Machinists Union??
    This is when you apologize and reach a 10 year deal or call for a U-Haul to move your stuff to SC...
  • PixiePal wrote...
    One more thing...
    what time does Washington's special legislative session start?? The article didn't say and surely there would be one announcing some big incentives...
  • Froggie wrote...
    No Clue
    The Machinists and Leadership have no clue as to the big picture, they like the free vacation every contract. Have talked with them and they want the free vacation in lieu of a future job. Living in the moment.
  • amoeba7 wrote...
    Death of Boeing in Washington State
    Remember what the Union did to the auto industry in Michigan? Isn't Detroit a ghost town now? Now there are manufacturing plants in Tennessee, South Carolina, North Carolina Just remember that the Democratic Governor and Legislature backed the Unions, gave fired workers unemployment benefits and taxed businesses to death here in Washington State. When Boeing gets the tanker deal, guarantee they will build the plane in SC too along with future planes. I'm a small biz and I'm dying here in the state. What makes you think Boeing will survive here with all of the strikes?
  • hpygolkyone wrote...
    Flight 787....You Are Cleared for Takeoff..........
    Just like the 'Super Friends'....our government check cashers are in a double secret session in 'The Hall of Justice'. It would appear that they have spent the last 3 weeks in 2 heated debates! One argument is to the exact location of South Carolina and the other appears to be whether to have chocolate pudding or the fruit cup with todays lunch! -Sigh-
  • CrankyConservative wrote...
    That Giant
    sucking sound you hear is the sound of jobs leaving the state for greener pastures; in this case, South Carolina. Making concessions and actually lowering taxes as an incentive to keep jobs here in WA State is abhorrent to the local politicos. They have yet to meet a tax they don't like.
  • cakemaster wrote...
    Everett Property
    Guess my home in Everett is going to be worth as much as a member of the IAMAW, NOTHING!
  • Glover W wrote...
    Unions are sounding the death nell for Boeing in Washington
    What all you workers at boeing don't realize is that you must be profitable. And people and businesses tend to move to where they are wanted. This state has made it very clear that they view private businesses as something to be put up with for a little while longer, but only because they came continue to tax them to the max! The vast majority of workers will be better off in a place where there are no unions. The idea of collective bargaining is a good one but the unions have bas#*@%!&ed that idea and now the leadership is self-serving. How much does the leadership make a year I ask? If the union leaders were truly looking out for the people they claim to represent they would be working for nothing. Let them have a regular day job and then also represent the union masses in the evening. but no they get full time salaried positions and huge expense accounts. That are all paid for by the union dues. Then there is the campaign contributions. The union party bosses are worse than lawyers in the sense that they produce nothing! And they go out of thier way to antagonize the workers and the upper management so they are always at each others throats so that they need the union leadership to negotitate a settlement. At least you can fire a lawyer if you don't like them but how do you fire a union party boss? Wake up workers you are going to lose your jobs unless you throw the bums out!


More headlines...





Home   |   Contact Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement   |   Copyright Infringement   |   Employment   |   EEO Public File Report   |   Contest Rules   |   Set Us as Your Home Page   |   RSS
Copyright © 2009 Bonneville International. All rights reserved.