powered by Bonneville Seattle - News Talk 97.3 KIRO FM and 770 KTTH: The Truth

Updated Sep 27, 2009 - 9:38 pm

Army to allow Iraq war objector to resign

Comments   |   Print this   |   E-mail this   |  
The Army is allowing the first commissioned officer to be court-martialed for refusing to go to Iraq to resign from the service, his attorney said late Friday.

First Lt. Ehren Watada will be granted a discharge Oct. 2, "under other than honorable conditions," attorney Kenneth Kagan said.

Watada told the Honolulu Star-Bulletin he was happy the matter has finally been closed.

"The actual outcome is different from the outcome that I envisioned in the first place, but I am grateful of the outcome," he said.

Fort Lewis spokesman Joseph Piek wouldn't confirm Watada's type of discharge, citing privacy rules. But he said late Friday that Watada's manner of resignation is described in Army regulations as "resignation for the good of the service in lieu of general court martial."

Watada, 31, refused to deploy to Iraq with his Fort Lewis, Wash.-based unit in 2006, arguing the war is illegal and that he would be a party to war crimes if he served in Iraq.

The Honolulu-born soldier was charged with missing his unit's deployment and with conduct unbecoming an officer for denouncing President Bush and the war - statements he made while explaining his actions.

His court-martial ended in mistrial in February 2007.

The Army wanted to try him in a second court-martial, but a federal judge ruled such a trial would violate the soldier's constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The judge said a second court-martial on key charges, including missing troop movement, would violate his constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy.

Watada's attorney said the soldier had handed in his resignation before, but the Army refused to accept it.

"This time, however, it was accepted, apparently only when the Army realized it could not defeat Lt. Watada in a courtroom," Kagan said.

Watada's father, Bob Watada, welcomed the news.

"I'm happy, very happy for Ehren. I'm happy for our family," he said.

Watada has been lionized by anti-war activists for contending that the war is illegal. If convicted, he could have been sentenced to six years in prison and be dishonorably discharged.

Kagan said he felt history would treat Watada "more favorably" than the U.S. Army.

"It has been our distinct honor to have represented a hero and a patriot," Kagan said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Comments (15)
  • Add A Comment

  • Lysander wrote...
    great news!!!
    I hope more soldiers and citizens alike start doing what they think is right rather than what the government tells them to do. More often than not it is your average citizen (or soldier) that knows far more about morality and the constitution.
  • Siriusly wrote...
    Ehren Watada is a gutless coward
    Watada's feelings on the war are irrelevant. He abandoned his soldiers right before they went into harm's way. By forcing his troops to go into combat with unfamiliar leadership he simply compounded all the dangers his men faced when THEY FULFILLED THEIR OATHS. Enlisted soldiers do not have the luxury of picking an choosing which orders they want to follow. How many men died because Watada chose to make a point before his deployment, as opposed to immediately afterward?
  • Had Enough wrote...
    HERO? PATRIOT? Try TRAITOR/TREASON/FIRING SQUAD
    Excuse me here just a moment. Since when does a mistrial mean that you can not be retried due to double jeopardy? Thats news to me. Activist judge once again. Shock in Seattle with it's corrupt system and political class. The founders would have had Watada shot for treason. They would have the federal judge disbarred and removed. And to Mr Kagan, I never faulted you for representing him as his attorney everyone is entitled to a defense. But your statement calling Watada a hero and a patriot is a disgrace. As someone who has had family serve for 14 generations dating back to the colonial militia, I am deeply offended. In another era sir, I would challenge you to a dual for such an insult to my country and my families honor. In this era, I would spit on your shoe only because I can't punch you in the nose.
  • J_B_Fisher wrote...
    The Wrong Time, at the Least
    If I were to leave my Soldiers immediately before deployment, I could never feel right about it. It would severely damage morale and unit readiness, and I would have to be replaced by another officer who had no relationship with my Soldiers. Consider 1LT Watada's rank (and thus his time in the Army as an officer). He accepted a commission as an officer during the last three years, in a very active time of the Iraq war. He accepted that commission knowing that he had a high likelyhood of being sent to Iraq. If he believed the war was illegal, he should never have accepted a commission in the first place.
  • Cash wrote...
    This is horrible...
    Watada is a criminal and needs to go to prison period... I can't believe anyone would think otherwise. Anyone calling him a hero is down right disgusting and a slap in the face to those who are truly American Heros. Watada is a coward and a dishonorable traitor to this Country and to his Unit.
  • kidjon wrote...
    worthless coward
    this little bee-otch needs to go to federal prison for awhile. I think he went into the Army knowing full well he was going to pull this stunt. What a terrible human being he is.
  • Loud Larry wrote...
    Sleep tight coward...
    The souls of 4,262 dead heroes will haunt your dreams.
  • Irishpaddy wrote...
    Gutlas piece
    I hope he has a miserable life knowing that thousands of American Patriots did their duty..No one drafted this piece of garbage.................
  • AJ McCarrell wrote...
    Yuck!
    In the service, you are expected to salute officers because they are a symbol of your country and the salute is an affirmation of that loyalty. Conversely, an officer is supposed to conduct himself in a manner that is above reproach in order that he does not disgrace that position. My grandfather fought in World War II and was actually against US involvement in the European Theatre, however he did his duty as a Captain and was shot down over Switzerland and spent time in a prison as a result. He was morally against what he was doing, but he fulfilled his oath as an officer regardless. A man like that should be honored, not a disgrace like Watada. Watada violated his oath and everyone who ever saluted him. Such a poor excuse of an officer should have been shot for treason. Had he fulfilled his duty and left the service, he would have still been a hero and a needed voice of dissent for his cause. By disobeying orders, disgracing his commission and violating the trust of his men, he is no longer a valid voice of anything. He should be shot for treason.
  • Informed wrote...
    Wahhhhhhh
    His Vagina hurts


More headlines...





Home   |   Contact Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement   |   Copyright Infringement   |   Employment   |   EEO Public File Report   |   Contest Rules   |   Set Us as Your Home Page   |   RSS
Copyright © 2009 Bonneville International. All rights reserved.